Written by

“How much does a Hornbill cost?” asked the boy to the nature guide, who’d helped him spot the hornbills flying to their roost site during dusk. I was a witness to this spectacle, but the question, like the autumn air, faded away in time.

A few years later during graduate school, I started learning the concepts of ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘ecological economics’, which deals with putting a price on the elements of nature and the services obtained from them. These elements directly or indirectly contribute to our well-being. 

The boy’s question, which seemed ‘useless’ to me back then, started echoing in the cortex of my brain as I engaged with the concept of ‘Value of Nature’. Soon, the lockdown happened and as the world muscled a pandemic, I got the time to mull over this question and fiddle it with perspectives rarely thought about.

When I was studying Hornbills for my project, I used to meet poachers, nature guides, tourists, and various other stakeholders. Everyone had a different value for the same object (the object being a living thing – the Hornbill). From our common sense, we can deduce that the value for the same object differs with the changing utility. To put in the context of Hornbills – for a poacher the value was Rs.1500-1700; for a tour guide, Rs.5000 – Rs.6000 (since the fee for a day trip is like Rs.1500, and usually tourist stay for 2-3 days); for the government – 30% of the GDP (Latpanchar village, famous for sighting and photographing nesting pair of Rufous-necked Hornbill, in Kurseong Block in Darjeeling earned revenue of Rs.20 lac/year (2011), which is 30% of the GDP of the Kurseong Block). Looking at all the gigantic differences among these figures, like all of you even I got more confused as ‘what is the actual price of the Hornbill’.

But, when we are talking about placing value on nature, people do take it negatively and argue that putting a price tag means losing out the intrinsic value of nature and inviting capitalism to rule. In reality, that might not be the case. The above example of Hornbill does showcase the value of nature changes with the exclusive services perceived by the stakeholders from the natural element. Therefore these values from the stakeholder or policymakers, point of view makes it easier to validate and understand the cost of replacement or reimbursement needed in case of the absence of its services. 

For better understanding, let’s take another realistic approach. Well, what would have been the price of the CoVID-19 virus a decade back for an experimental lab? Well, maybe a few thousand rupees. But what now in the current context is the value?  To help in contextualize, only the economic loss (leaving the deaths and human emotions) caused due to the CoVID-19 is near 10 trillion USD, which is more than the GDP of Japan and Germany together.  So does that mean the value of CoVID – 19 virus in the current time, is the financial impact of  virus or the economic value of medical treatments (Vaccines and therapeutics) needed to survive, which one ?

5 responses

  1. a2r2verma Avatar

    Thought provoking article, just if the cost of one tree of 100 years old is more than a crore. What would be the good estimate value of a hornbill ?
    It will be interesting to see what will be coming out in next part ?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Prajjwal Kumar Avatar
    Prajjwal Kumar

    The only cost human see is in the terms of money which is itself flawed, because the same amount of money have different value for different parties (people, organization), it’s high time we need to change our perspective towards nature and try to stop being its owner.
    Nice thought provoking article, please keep writing…

    Liked by 1 person

  3. snigdhakashyap Avatar

    Well written article! As you rightly mentioned people think putting a value on nature means inviting capitalism! But indeed this is the capitalism we actually need so as to make people aware about how precious the nature is, how their livelihood is dependent on it and at what cost!!

    I personally liked the last part of the article, very thought provoking. A nano particle ruling a world trillions and trillions of it’s size, it’s rare! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  4. 🙂🙏🏽 Avatar
    🙂🙏🏽

    Time, Circumstance and Impact imbibes the value which is always under transition. Nature do evolve but accompanying with it Ideas and perception too.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Shreyas Das Avatar
    Shreyas Das

    Well written. Rightly said, the value of nature changes with its utility. This brings us to a realisation that environment is protected only if it has some economical value to it, if not then there is literally no incentive for governments and corporates to protect it. So, a big question here is “ should economy be the centre of focus when it comes to environment? If so, then are we really protecting environment or just safeguarding it until it’s utility is nullified?”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to 🙂🙏🏽 Cancel reply